Incoming · 3
FCO inspector · content-addressed application object
SiteSection
One canonical FCO → one canonical SHA-256 identity. Follow FCG edges to reconstruct dependencies without treating identity as correctness.
HASH IDENTITY PASSIDENTITY ≠ CORRECTNESS
The content hash is the canonical address.
FCO ID
fco:47ae02fd60392410188b096c49adac14981fd036b449c2a4dfb3ed26225d5f5e
Object SHA-256
47ae02fd60392410188b096c49adac14981fd036b449c2a4dfb3ed26225d5f5e
identity_check=PASS
Declared object state.
{
"route": "/custody",
"label": "Custody",
"role": "hash-signature-and-key-boundary",
"claim": "CRYPTOGRAPHIC_STATUS_AND_SIGNING_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION",
"project": "HydraDG",
"evidence_class": "DETERMINISTIC_APPLICATION_METADATA",
"custody_state": "HASHED",
"signature_state": "NOT_SIGNED",
"claim_ceiling": "CRYPTOGRAPHIC_STATUS_AND_SIGNING_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION",
"hackathon_authorship_window": "2026-08-12_OR_LATER_REQUIRED"
}Follow the dependency route.
Resolve the object in context.
The canonical hosted FCG has a separate readback/parity receipt. Website FCOs are deterministic application objects. Signature state and Merkle commitment remain separate from hashing and are not implied here.