Incoming · 1
FCO inspector · content-addressed application object
SiteSection
One canonical FCO → one canonical SHA-256 identity. Follow FCG edges to reconstruct dependencies without treating identity as correctness.
HASH IDENTITY PASSIDENTITY ≠ CORRECTNESS
The content hash is the canonical address.
FCO ID
fco:8f6832405f140b3eba8a22823cd14b4ed8fcd957321128426b7f8bfcfb9a8914
Object SHA-256
8f6832405f140b3eba8a22823cd14b4ed8fcd957321128426b7f8bfcfb9a8914
identity_check=PASS
Declared object state.
{
"route": "/results/context-vs-entropy",
"label": "Context vs Entropy",
"role": "secret-context-classification-result",
"claim": "MEASURED_CONTEXT_CLASSIFICATION_RESULT",
"project": "HydraDG",
"evidence_class": "DETERMINISTIC_APPLICATION_METADATA",
"custody_state": "HASHED",
"signature_state": "NOT_SIGNED",
"claim_ceiling": "MEASURED_CONTEXT_CLASSIFICATION_RESULT",
"hackathon_authorship_window": "2026-08-12_OR_LATER_REQUIRED"
}Follow the dependency route.
Resolve the object in context.
The canonical hosted FCG has a separate readback/parity receipt. Website FCOs are deterministic application objects. Signature state and Merkle commitment remain separate from hashing and are not implied here.